The recent increase in the number of independent MPs in the Parliament, now totaling 14, raises questions about the possibility of forming a parliamentary group. With this number exceeding the minimum threshold of 10 required by parliamentary regulations, conditions appear favorable. However, the reality proves to be more complex.
The current Parliament already holds a record for the representation of parties, with nine parties present, eight of which are elected. Experts consider the likelihood of reaching 10 parliamentary groups to be difficult, given that the independent MPs come from nearly the entire political spectrum.
Following the expulsion of Marios Salmas from New Democracy, the number of independent MPs rose to 14, yet the lack of a “binding substance” makes collaboration challenging. Half of the independents hail from the Spartans, limiting the chances of cooperation with the other MPs.
The demographics of this group include MPs from various parties: two from the Freedom Movement, two from New Democracy, one from SYRIZA, one from PASOK, and one from Greek Solution. Notably, the two MPs from the Freedom Movement are first-degree relatives.
A significant obstacle to creating a parliamentary group remains the stance of the MPs from New Democracy. Lefteris Avgenakis and Marios Salmas appear reluctant to join another group, with Avgenakis continuing to support the government.
History shows that independent MPs have previously formed parliamentary groups. A characteristic example is the group “Independent Democratic MPs,” which was established in 2013 by 11 MPs from various parties. This group enjoyed the privileges outlined by parliamentary regulations until the dissolution of Parliament in 2014.
In conclusion, while the 14 independent MPs have the numerical capacity to form a parliamentary group, their political origins and internal differences significantly complicate this effort. Uncertainty remains as everyone awaits their next moves.
